Skip to main content

Week 15/Final Post Prompt

 





       After reading the article, I'm 14, and I Quit Social Media, there are a couple things that come to mind. The first being that I completely understand what she was saying about being embarrassed after finding out that her family had been posting things about her on social media. I didn't find out in the same way, but when I did find pictures of me that my family had posted without telling me, it did bother me a lot.

"I didn't have control": A 14-year-old on why she quit social media (fastcompany.com)


    On this same website, fastcompany.com, there is an article about incognito mode on internet browsers don't really keep your browsing history private. This article talks about how incognito mode on internet browsers give users a false sense of security and it also talks about another method which is called "Browser Compartmentalization." 


For real web privacy, try browser compartmentalization (fastcompany.com)


    In an article from The Atlantic called Facebook Users Still Don't Know, they talk about how Facebook collects data on its users. Specifically, this article says two things that stick out to me. The first of them being that the majority of Facebook's users still don't know that Facebook collects the kind of data that it does. I don't have any hard data on this, but one thing the article mentions is the personalized ads that are tailored for each user. This is something that is very easy to notice and recognize. In addition to that, I have never talked to anyone who has not noticed this. The second thing that stuck out to me from this article is that 51% of people surveyed said they were not comfortable with Facebook collecting this information. There's nothing to say why almost half of everyone surveyed was okay with their information being collected, but that high of a percentage of people who were okay with is likely a big part of why it's still being done.


How Facebook Advertising Works - The Atlantic


    When it comes to my online footprint, I wouldn't say that I have too big of one, but it is also bigger than many others. I use Twitter, Instagram, and Facebook. In at least the past 5 years, I have not posted anything on Facebook or Twitter. With Instagram, I have posted things, but I only do that rarely. With my social media, the majority of what someone could learn about me is where I've gone for school, and that I have a dog. In thinking about whether social media makes people depressed, lonely, or isolated, there are two ways to think about it. It is very possible that social media can make someone depressed, lonely, or isolated. Someone can see what other people are posting and start comparing their life to the life that others are presenting online. In addition to that, cyberbullying is a factor. On the other hand, social media can help people be more social electronically. People can reconnect to people they haven't seen in a long time, and in some cases, people can even connect with new people.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Blog 3

  https://news.yahoo.com/poll-worker-fired-turning-away-220624357.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly9uZXdzLmdvb2dsZS5jb20v&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAJARih1vzsxQ9f-Q4mxkWJh5emDtgMMEqV4XQRbJBFC2wytHFXDRKTkjXImI0v9tydg4akr05kZeJIrwAmdVh8wmWGJcIzaHZ76Sq7u0Hx48eargdeB67yxSC5rCvspPNlwb5chw7IuZUBIb9eaeyYRqqOx6nhPS2C-9ksWrX0AN          The article above talks about a situation where a poll worker in Memphis, Tennessee turned away several voters who were wearing "Black Lives Matter" and "I Can't Breath" shirts. This article mentions that according to Tennessee law, voters are not allowed to wear anything with the name of a candidate or political party, but specifically says that Tennessee law says that "Black Lives Matter" is not prohibited.           This relates to the six freedoms of the First Amendment because this is considered freedom of speech. According to the article, this worker thought the statements on the shirts were tied to the Democr

U.S. Supreme Court

      In watching the Youtube videos about the United States Supreme Court, there were two things that stuck out. These were the culture within the U.S. Supreme Court and the background processes of the Supreme Court.      One part of the culture that is talked about is how even though the different justices disagree on different topics, they all have the same goal and have great respect for one another. This respect is very significant due to the many different backgrounds of each justice.      Regarding the background processes of the Supreme Court, one thing that stuck out is that there are 7,000 cases that come in each year and the Supreme Court only takes 100 of those for serious consideration. The justices meet to choose which cases they will work on and vote on previously reviewed cases. The thing that stuck out the most happens after the justices vote. This is an opinion given by one of the justices on the majority side where they give the legal reasons for the decision. The le

Blog #4

           In looking through antiwar.com and theamericanconservative.com there were a couple things that I noticed. First, with antiwar.com, the site does not seem very professional. I didn't look too much into the content, but with how the site is formatted, I would be very reluctant to take anything I might see on it at face value. Moving on to theamericanconservative.com, from what I could see, the site seemed biased to me. Although many news sources are biased to a certain degree, it is harder to trust one that is less known compared to one that is established.      Regarding the antiwar voices, they have such strong opinions that would be very controversial and criticized in mainstream news. These bold opinions are also why it is so difficult to find them.